|
Calorie restriction has long
been viewed as a way to extend life for organisms ranging from yeast to
mammals -- including, possibly, humans.
Now new research in yeast suggests
that cutting calories may lengthen life span by boosting an organism's
oxygen consumption -- findings that are in complete contrast to a major
theory on why eating less might tack some time onto our lives.
That bit of "conventional
wisdom" held that calorie restriction, by lowering metabolism, cut
down on the amount of oxygen free radicals circulating in the body. These
cell-damaging forms of oxygen are normal byproducts of metabolism.
That idea has been around for
a long time, but researchers believe the conventional wisdom is wrong.
They had previously found that a gene called Sir2 appears vital in longevity.
In yeast, deleting the gene
shaves the life span, while adding an extra Sir2 extends it. The researchers
were also able to show that the activity of Sir2 -- which helps regulate
the expression of other genes -- is tied to metabolism. To do its job,
Sir2 is dependent on a chemical known as NAD that assists in breaking
down food and aids metabolism.
In this latest study, they
looked at how calorie restriction might boost Sir2 activity and thereby
extend the life span of yeast. The investigators found that, in contrast
to the slowed-metabolism theory, sugar-deprived yeast cells boosted their
oxygen consumption -- which would, in theory, increase oxygen free radicals
in a human.
They further found that overexpressing
a gene believed to rev up oxygen consumption extended the life span of
yeast cells -- an effect that, like calorie restriction, required the
Sir2 gene.
All of this suggests that calorie
restriction does not make yeast longer-lived by fighting oxidative damage.
It isn't that metabolism slows.
It changes qualitatively. According to the researcher, the relationship
among calorie restriction, the Sir2 gene and life span appears "much
deeper" than the theory on slowed metabolism and reduced oxidative
damage would indicate.
But exactly how cutting calories
might act upon Sir2, and thereby life span, remains unknown.
In an accompanying editorial,
researchers at Harvard University in Boston point out that what applies
to yeast won't necessarily apply in animals.
Nature
July 18, 2002;418:287-288, 344-348
|