|
Page 1 of 2 (Page
2)
by Jeremy Rifkin, Mother
Jones
Research by Larry Gordon
and Dan Smith
This article was originally published
back in 1977 in Mother
Jones magazine.
On September 22, 1976, President Ford
sent a memorandum to the heads of all major federal departments
and agencies. Although it received no attention at the time,
the President's memo may be remembered years from now as the
keynote to one of the most significant developments of the
20th century.
The memo concerned the formation of a
new Interagency Committee of the federal government. Its mission:
"To review federal policy o the conduct of research involving
the creation of new forms of life."
That Interagency Committee has since convened
at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland,
on November 4 and November 23, for a total of five hours and
30 minutes. There were no TV crews present, no photographer
to shoot pictures of the proceedings for the record book.
UPI and AP didn't even list the meeting on their daily calendars
of important events to cover in Washington. Both sessions
were conducted behind closed doors.
With these meetings, just three years
after molecular biologists had succeeded in separating and
recombining the DNA molecules that carry the genetic code
for all living beings,
unlocking for the first time the
secret of creating life itself, the United States
officially entered the Organic
Age.
Up to now, human beings have been engaged
in a constant battle against the elements. We have used our
wits to harness the resources of the external world for our
own survival. Ours was a finite reality. At best, we could
manipulate and exploit parts of our universe for our own ends;
at worst, we could destroy those parts of the outside environment
that threatened our well-being.
In short, our
limits were established by what already existed.
Within the past 30 years we have approached the outer limits
of that finite world of matter and energy with the splitting
of the atom, our entry into the
Nuclear Age.
Yet now, even as we still grapple with
the nuclear demon, a new phenomenon has emerged, having to
do with the world of life itself. With the unlocking of the
secrets of DNA, we will eventually be able to change the cellular
structure of living beings and to create entirely new species.
Biologists are already doing it with microorganisms. The Nuclear
Age was the age of the physicist; the Organic Age is the age
of the biologist.
At this moment, microbiologists are at
work in more than 180 separate laboratories across the country,
busily spending more than 20 million dollars in government
grants in pursuit of the
creation of new forms of life. They are experimenting
with so-called recombinant DNA.
By now most newspaper readers have heard
of the controversy surrounding DNA research at universities.
But, sheltered from the glare of publicity that bathes every
new debate at Harvard or Stanford, something much more ominous
is happening.
Today seven major drug companies are engaged
in, or about to begin, recombinant-DNA research. The companies
will soon apply for patents
on the new forms of life they are developing. In
time this research will translate into an unparalleled commercial
bonanza for the pharmaceutical, chemical and agricultural
companies as they introduce literally dozens of new-life-form
products into the market place.
General Electric is already out in front
with the announcement that it has applied for a patent on
a tiny microorganism that can eat up oil spills.
While the commercial prospects for this
new technology have whetted corporate appetites, the potential
dangers in its further development and application-although
some of them are still years off-pose perhaps the
single greatest challenge to life that humankind has ever
faced.
That challenge is made more awesome by
the fact that virtually any amateur biologist can obtain the
enzymes necessary to experiment with new life forms. Miles
Laboratory, which markets the enzymes, admits that most of
its enzymes sales are done through the mail, and that there
are no "guarantees of what the customer will do"
once that person receives the biological materials.
How does one even begin to look at a technology
that could eventually lead to the creation of new plants,
animals and even the
alteration of the human species?
And then there is a more immediate question
before us as we enter the Organic Age: should our present
corporate system be used as the developing and marketing process
when life itself is the product?
Recombinant DNA is a recently developed
technique that recombines DNA segments (the basic material
determining the hereditary characteristics of all life) from
two different organisms.
Scientists became able to do this when
they found that DNA segments had "sticky" ends that,
under proper laboratory conditions, could be fastened to another
organism's DNA segments. Thus is formed the genetic basis
for new living and multiplying organisms that do not exist
in the natural evolutionary order.
Although most scientists agree that recombinant
DNA is one of the most important scientific breakthroughs
of modern history, they violently disagree as to whether the
potential benefits of even the most restricted experimentation
outweigh the grave potential
dangers to human life and the environment.
Paul Berg, a prominent recombinant-DNA
researcher at the Stanford University School of Medicine,
believes experimentation in recombinants could result in the
creation of major new food crops that can obtain nitrogen
from the atmosphere rather than from fertilizer; a new form
of medicine, gene therapy, to treat crippling genetic diseases;
and such things as cheap and efficient production of vitamins,
antibiotics and hormones.
On the other hand, scientists like Liebe
Cavalieri of the Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
argue for a complete moratorium on recombinant-DNA research
until the long-range implications are fully discussed.
Cavalieri points out that such research
"involves many unknown
factors beyond the control of the scientist."
According to Cavalieri, "it is necessary to create vast
numbers of cells with unknown genetic alterations in order
to obtain a cell containing a specific recombinant DNA."
He continues: "The probability of
creating a dangerous genetic agent in the process is real,
and there is no way to test for the danger. The scientist
does not know what he has done until he has analyzed the newly
created cell-at which point it may be too late."
At that point,
science fiction's most horrible scenarios become fact.
Cavalieri and his colleagues are deeply
concerned over the possibility that a new Andromeda-type virus,
for which there is no known immunization, might accidentally
be developed in a laboratory somewhere and spread a deadly
epidemic across the planet, killing hundreds of
millions of people.
They also fear that a new, highly resistant
plant might be developed that could wipe out all other vegetation
and animal life in its path. Dr. Robert Sinsheimer, who chairs
the Biology Division of the California Institute of Technology,
warns that "the invention and introduction of new self-reproducing
living forms may well be irreversible."
Sinsheimer asks: "How do we prevent grievous missteps,
inherently untraceable?"
Sinsheimer got the first tentative answer
to his question last summer when the City Council of Cambridge,
Massachusetts, voted to prohibit work on recombinant DNA at
Harvard and MIT pending further public investigation. This
unparalleled public restriction of scientific research focused,
for the first time, the attention of the national media on
the question of the creation of new life forms.
But even as scientists, public-interest
groups, social commentators and the media continue to rehash
the implications of the Cambridge incident, another development,
almost totally ignored in the press, may be far more significant
than any event that has taken place in academia: the entry
into the field of DNA research of the private corporation.
On September 23, 1976, a little-noticed
Washington Post story reported: "US health officials
acknowledged that the government does not know what companies
are trying to create revolutionary
new forms of life or the whereabouts of their laboratories."
Dr. Bernard Talbot of the Office of the
Director of NIH told us that "as of now, there is no
federal agency that is looking at research being done by private
industry in recombinant DNA.... We have no registry [of companies
involved in this field]."
It is probably true that NIH and other
federal agencies are unaware of the specific nature of the
research going on in private industry. However,
governmental authorities do know what companies are involved
in this research and where their plants are located, but they
have not been willing to make this information public.
At present, seven
major pharmaceutical companies are now engaged
in or about to be engaged in secret recombinant-DNA research.
Nine other corporations involved in drugs, chemicals and agricultural
products are now looking into the potential application of
recombinant DNA.
They are: Cetus Corporation, CIBA-Geigy
Corporation, DuPont, Dow, W.R. Grace & Company, Monsanto,
French Laboratories, Wyeth Laboratories and Searle Laboratories.
|
Corporations
in DNA Research
|
| Company |
Location of Laboratory
|
State of
Research |
|
Miles Laboratories
(Dr. Robert Erickson,
Dept. of Science Information and Communication Services)
|
Rochester,
NY, and South Bend, IN (Research under contract to universities) |
Ongoing |
Eli Lilly
& Company
(Dr. Cornelius W. Pettinga, Executive Vice President) |
Indianapolis,
IN |
Ongoing |
Hoffman-LaRoche
(Dr. Sidney Udenfriend, Director, Roche Institute) |
Nutley, NJ |
Ongoing |
The Upjohn
Company
(Dr. Joe Grady, Section Head, Infectious Diseases) |
Kalamazoo,
MI |
Ongoing |
Merck,
Sharpe & Dohme Research Laboratories
(Dr. Jerome Birnbaum, Executive Director, Basic Biological
Sciences) |
Rathway, NJ |
Tooling up |
Pfizer,
Inc.
(Dr. John DeZeeuew, Research Scientist) |
Groton, CT |
Tooling up |
Abbott
Laboratories
(Dr. Lacy Overby, Director, Experimental Biology) |
North Chicago,
IL |
Tooling up |
The almost airtight secrecy surrounding
this particular research, says Medical World News, is "reminiscent
of the atmosphere surrounding biological-warfare research
a few years ago."
Tom Craig, the public-relations representative
for Abbott, said that his firm has no
intention of informing the general public about
Abbott's activities, "because it's often difficult to
obtain an understanding of what is being done. It creates
more alarm than is justified.
At Upjohn, public relations chief Joe
Haywood even tried, at first, to deny that the firm had any
role in recombinant-DNA research. Only when confronted with
hard evidence did he finally admit to Upjohn's involvement.
At Roche Institute, an assistant to the
director who identified himself as Dr. Bartle refused any
comment when asked when the new maximum-control facilities
would be operational and how many researchers would be involved.
Similar responses were invoked right down the line in interview
after interview with various company officials across the
country.
It's not surprising, then, that a check
with public officials in Rochester, Kalamazoo, South Bend,
and Nutley revealed that none
were aware of secret research into recombinant
DNA going on in laboratories in their communities.
In Kalamazoo, Michigan, Mayor Francis
Hamilton pointed out that, while the Upjohn laboratory was
"within three blocks of where I'm sitting," he had
not been informed by the company that it was involved in recombinant-DNA
research.
In New Jersey, Dennis Helms, in the Attorney
General's office (who is already in charge of an investigation
into recombinant DNA in his state), was asked if he knew of
any firms doing any P-4 level recombinant-DNA research. ("P-4"
refers to maximum-risk research controls.)
Helms said it was his understanding from
people in the industry that NIH, in Bethesda, Maryland, has
the only P-4 facility in the country. Helms was then asked
if the Hoffman-LaRoche Company had informed the Attorney General's
office that they were constructing a P-4 facility in Nutley,
New Jersey. The answer was no.
Even though NIH (the agency responsible
for overseeing the Interagency Committee) continues to assert
that it has no "official" knowledge of research
going on in the private sector, its director, Dr. Donald Frederickson,
initiated a meeting nine months ago (on June 2, 1976) with
representatives of 20 US corporations to ascertain their interests
and needs regarding research into recombinant DNA.
At a meeting held at NIH headquarters
on December 3, 1976, Frederickson himself said:
"It
is essential there be a way the industrial technology of
this country can take advantage of this."
This cozy behind-the-scenes relationship
between industry and government officials isn't hard to understand
once one looks into the backgrounds of the officials involved.
A number of the consultants to or members
of the NIH group that drew up the government's regulatory
guidelines on DNA research have industry ties-among them Dr.
Ernest Jaworski of the Monsanto Company and Dr. Louis G. Nickell
of W.R. Grace & Company.
More important still, of the 15 members
of the key Interagency Committee for whom we were able to
obtain background biographies, seven had previously been employed
with major US corporations. Two of these had served with major
pharmaceutical companies now involved in recombinant-DNA work.
Oswald Ganley, the State Department representative
to the committee, was previously employed as Assistant Director
of International Relations at Merck, Sharpe and Dohme Laboratories;
and Department of Transportation representative William D.
Owens was at one time a director of a subsidiary of the Searle
Corporation.
Part
2
|